Attorney's Fees

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part III: Abuse of Process

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part III: Abuse of Process

This is the third and last in a series of blog posts addressing judicial mechanisms intended to prevent abuse of the legal system. In the first, we discussed the inadequacies of Rule 11. In the second, we discussed the practical application of the fee-shifting statute, NRS 18.010. In this post, we will be discussing a separate tort claim called abuse of process.

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part II: NRS 18.010

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part II: NRS 18.010

In the previous post, we discussed the requirements and ineffectiveness of N.R.C.P. 11, which is a rule designed to prevent attorneys and parties to a lawsuit from making improper written representations to the court and from pursuing inappropriate claims or defenses. In a future post, we will be discussing abuse of process as a separate claim.

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part I: Rule 11

Abuse of Process and Frivolous Lawsuits Part I: Rule 11

The news is replete with stories of frivolous lawsuits. For example, everyone remembers the multimillion dollar verdict against McDonald’s when a woman was burned after she spilled her coffee. (In fairness to the legal system, the judge did reduce the jury’s award by over 75%—but many consider even the reduced verdict too excessive.)